Sent to the editor of the Chattanooga Times-Free Press. 

I agree with the Free Press editor’s contention that states ought not be in the business of producing special license plates.  However, his argument for the inclusion of a pointedly Christian plate fails to persuade.

The special plates expressing “environmental, philosophical or other viewpoints” are not religious in nature. They are secular. Therefore, arguing that because they are permitted, a Christian plate ought to be permitted as well puts Christianity (or any other religion) in the same category with “environmental, philosophical or other viewpoints.” And I’m sure the editor did not mean to imply that.

Our Constitution does not preclude states from promoting “environmental, philosophical or other viewpoints.” It proscribes the endorsement or promotion of religion, and that is what a license plate with a cross and the words, “I believe.” would do. The Constitution is silent on bumper stickers.

The editor also smears the Secular Humanists of the Low Country by characterizing them as “opposing religion (especially Christianity).” I looked at their website, as did the editor, but I found nothing in opposition to any religion. They are forthright in their beliefs, as would be any devout Christian.

Promoting one’s beliefs is perfectly acceptable. Demonizing others is not.